In Baltimore City, concerns about law enforcement accountability were reignited when Baltimore Police Officer Robert Parks was indicted after a viral video circulated across social media platforms. The footage allegedly showed Officer Parks using his police cruiser to chase a man in the Park Heights area near Wylie Avenue. Prosecutors say the incident reflects dangerous conduct, prompting criminal charges including second-degree attempted murder, first-degree assault, second-degree assault, reckless driving and misconduct in office.
According to Baltimore City State’s Attorney Ivan Bates, the actions captured in the viral clip demonstrated severe risks to the individual being pursued, as well as to the public. With added video footage obtained through the Police Integrity Unit and additional surveillance from nearby businesses, investigators pieced together a more complete timeline of what happened. These details raised questions about police powers, emergency vehicle policies and the broader limits of law enforcement authority.
This blog examines the charges, events, surrounding context and implications for the Baltimore Police Department and public trust.
How the Incident Began
The indictment outlines that on October 28, Officer Parks drove to Wiley Liquors, also known locally as Wylie Liquors, along Wylie Avenue in Baltimore City. Wearing his official uniform and operating his assigned patrol vehicle, Parks approached a group of individuals standing outside the liquor store. According to documents released by prosecutors, Parks allegedly told them, “It’s getting a little hot, guys. I just need you guys to take a lap.”
One man separated from the group and walked away. Minutes later, Officer Parks followed in his police vehicle, stopping near the individual. The indictment claims that Parks called him by name and motioned for him to come over. When the man refused and continued walking, Parks allegedly warned him not to make the situation worse.
This interaction marked the start of a dramatic pursuit that gained national attention after video footage went viral.
The Viral Video and Escalation
The viral clip, circulated widely on social media platforms and shared by outlets including CBS News and WBAL-TV 11 News, shows the police cruiser accelerating toward the individual as he runs through a paved driveway. On police radio communications captured during the chase, Parks is heard stating, “I have one running, adult male in the alley.”
According to the indictment, the man had a misdemeanor warrant but was not considered a violent threat. Prosecutors emphasize that a misdemeanor warrant does not justify using a motor vehicle as a weapon. The indictment alleges that Parks drove directly at the man, striking him at least once. As the man ran onto the sidewalk between a chain-link fence and a utility pole, Parks allegedly drove the police cruiser onto the sidewalk and continued chasing him.
Additional video recordings, including surveillance from businesses near the scene and body-worn camera footage from other officers, gave prosecutors more clarity about the chase. State’s Attorney Ivan Bates stated that these additional videos were “disturbing” and showed more than what the viral moment captured.
Driving Through a Fence and Backyard
After the man tried to escape, the indictment claims that Parks made a sharp turn and plowed the patrol vehicle through a standing chain-link fence, entering a backyard. The man was forced to jump over another fence to avoid being hit. The police vehicle became disabled after crashing through the barrier, marking the end of the vehicular pursuit.
Officer Parks exited the cruiser and attempted a brief foot chase before returning to the disabled patrol vehicle. The pursuit ended there, but the video recording had already captured enough to raise serious concerns about use of force, police response and the appropriate limits of emergency vehicle policies.
Charges Against Officer Robert Parks
The Baltimore City State’s Attorney announced multiple criminal counts against Parks. They include:
- Second-degree attempted murder
- First-degree assault
- Second-degree assault
- Reckless driving
- Misconduct in office
If convicted on all charges, Officer Parks faces a maximum prison sentence of sixty-five years. Prosecutors emphasized that whether an individual is a civilian or a Baltimore Police officer, using a vehicle as a weapon is treated as a serious criminal offense. Bates stressed that no one is above the law, including those entrusted with law enforcement responsibilities.
The charges reflect broader concerns about public safety, internal investigation standards and how officers use departmental vehicles during active encounters.
State’s Attorney Ivan Bates Addresses the Public
State’s Attorney Ivan Bates highlighted the severity of what the public witnessed in the viral video. During a press conference, Bates clarified that the widely shared recording did not show the full sequence of events. He credited the Police Integrity Unit with gathering additional surveillance footage from nearby businesses and conducting a thorough internal investigation.
Bates said some of the footage not yet released publicly was even more alarming than the viral clip. According to Bates, these additional recordings justified the criminal charges. The Baltimore Police Department confirmed that its own internal investigation was ongoing and would continue independently of the criminal case.
Perspective From Baltimore Police Officials
Baltimore Police Commissioner Richard Worley released a brief statement noting that the department is fully cooperating with investigators. He confirmed that Officer Parks was initially suspended with pay but later changed to suspended without pay. Worley said that Baltimore Police officers must adhere to strict use-of-force policies and that the department takes allegations of misconduct seriously.
Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott also addressed the incident, saying that the video and indictment highlight the need for consistent accountability within the Baltimore Police Department. Brandon Scott reiterated that police powers must always align with established policies and public expectations.
Response From the Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 3
The Baltimore City Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 3, which represents Baltimore Police officers, urged the public not to jump to conclusions. The union stressed that an indictment does not equal guilt, and that certain facts known to Officer Robert Parks were not disclosed during the prosecutor’s press briefing.
The union also pointed to past high-profile cases, such as the Freddie Gray protests and other media coverage involving Baltimore Police, suggesting that video circulating online can lead to premature judgments before the full investigation is complete.
They encouraged the public to wait for all evidence, including body-worn camera footage, police reports and any additional video recording from nearby businesses.
Larger Context for Baltimore Police and Public Trust
The incident occurs amid ongoing reform discussions in the Baltimore Police Department. Issues such as law enforcement oversight, internal investigation transparency and adherence to use-of-force policies remain central concerns.
Past controversies, including the Gun Trace Task Force scandal, reshaped expectations for accountability. Cases like this intensify debates about police cruiser use, police radio communication protocols and whether emergency vehicle policies adequately restrict vehicle-as-a-weapon scenarios.
The incident also influences public perception of community trust, breaking news cycles and national conversations on policing.
Legal Themes Raised by the Case
Several legal questions arise from the charges:
1. Attempted Murder and Intent
Prosecutors must demonstrate that Officer Parks acted with intent consistent with second-degree attempted murder. The use of a police vehicle in a manner that could cause serious injury or death forms the core of the allegation.
2. Assault Charges
First-degree and second-degree assault charges relate to whether the officer’s conduct placed the man at risk of harm beyond lawful police response.
3. Misconduct in Office
This criminal count concerns abusing official authority, violating public trust and failing to follow professional standards.
4. Reckless Driving
This applies because the police cruiser was allegedly used in a dangerous manner inconsistent with emergency vehicle policies.
5. Vehicle as a Weapon
The indictment treats the police vehicle as a weapon, reinforcing legal limits on using motor vehicles to stop fleeing individuals unless they pose an imminent threat.
Each of these charges highlights the balance between police authority and civilian rights.
Public Reaction and Media Coverage
The video recording spread rapidly, amplified by global reporting outlets, local news channels and discussions across social media platforms. Many expressed concern about the nature of the pursuit, which appeared more intense than typical police response to a misdemeanor warrant.
CBS News reported on the case within hours of the video gaining traction, and WBAL-TV 11 News provided continuing coverage as prosecutors announced updates. Local residents in Park Heights voiced mixed reactions, with some stating that such conduct undermines community safety.
This widespread attention means the case has become more than a local incident. It has become a national conversation on policing conduct and accountability.
Broader Impact on Law Enforcement Practices
Law enforcement agencies across the country often review similar incidents to evaluate their own policies. This case may influence:
- How patrol vehicle pursuits are handled
- When officers can use a police cruiser during a chase
- Training related to emergency vehicle policies
- Internal protocols for documenting use-of-force incidents
- How surveillance and body-worn camera footage is reviewed
Incidents involving a police vehicle used in a high-risk manner often lead to department-wide reassessment of pursuit procedures.
Conclusion
The indictment of Baltimore Police Officer Robert Parks is a significant moment in Baltimore City’s continuing dialogue about police accountability. With charges ranging from second-degree attempted murder to reckless driving and misconduct in office, the case places a spotlight on how law enforcement actions are evaluated under the law.
As the criminal case proceeds, both the public and legal analysts will continue following the developments closely. The outcome will not only affect Officer Parks but may also influence future policy decisions within the Baltimore Police Department and other agencies nationwide.
About Ted Law
At Ted Law Firm,We serve families across Aiken, Anderson, Charleston, Columbia, Greenville, Myrtle Beach, North Augusta and Orangeburg. is committed to providing clarity, guidance and support to individuals who seek understanding during complex legal situations. The firm values fairness, communication and the belief that every person deserves to have their concerns taken seriously.Contact us today for a free consultation.
