Self-Driving Crashes

The US Department of Transportation has officially announced significant regulatory changes to how crash reporting requirements apply to automated vehicle operations across US roads. This move has been framed as part of a broader regulatory shift designed to promote innovation in self-driving technology and driverless cars while streamlining regulatory frameworks. However, critics warn it could weaken federal safety standards and reduce public safety oversight.

The changes were introduced amid growing international competition in the global market for autonomous driving solutions, with major self-driving car companies like Tesla, GM Cruise, and Mercedes Benz advancing projects such as robotaxi service driverless testing, and autonomous ride-hailing service. While the automotive industry has praised the regulatory approval process for easing burdens, traffic safety watchdogs and independent analysts see possible risks to societal trust in these technologies.

What Has Changed in the Crash Reporting Rules?

The new policy revises the Standing General Order (SGO) on automated vehicle crash data, altering how crash data is collected and reported by manufacturers and operators of self-driving vehicles.

Key updates include:

  • Extending the deadline for serious incidents involving Level 2 systems or higher from one day to five days.
  • Removing follow-up reports for certain categories of crashes.
  • Limiting the requirement for minor incidents to those involving property damage above $1,000 or a single automated vehicle in an event.
  • Allowing months with no qualifying incidents to go unreported, which some fear could mask crash patterns that affect vehicle safety.

This reduction in crash-reporting requirement frequency means many smaller incidents, including those related to driver-assistance features or self-driving software, will no longer reach public databases like those used by Consumer Reports or California regulators.

Industry Perspective: Pushing Innovation Forward

The Trump administration had previously signaled interest in accelerating the deployment of Full Self-Driving and other autonomous-driving systems. Now, under evolving automotive policy, federal safety regulators are prioritizing national competitiveness.

Notably, Tesla CEO Elon Musk has long criticized cumbersome federal requirements that he says slow down self-driving car race progress. Projects like Tesla’s Autopilot, Tesla Vision, and Full Self Driving upgrades for Model Ys, Tesla Cybertruck, and Tesla taxis are positioned to benefit from a lighter safety framework.

Similarly, companies like GM Cruise and Mercedes Benz are integrating advanced artificial intelligence systems, neural nets, drive by wire platforms, and even Camtronic system braking technologies to meet federal safety regulations while staying ahead in the global market.

Safety Advocates’ Concerns Over Public Safety

Despite promises of improved efficiency, traffic safety watchdogs argue that reducing crash reporting undermines transparency. They emphasize that self-driving regulations must prioritize public safety over speed of deployment.

Groups warn that without full access to automated vehicle crash data, researchers cannot properly analyze crash patterns, identify vehicle safety flaws, or verify compliance with federal safety standards.

Some are especially concerned about self-driving car companies withholding crash data that could reveal flaws in self-driving software, driver-assistance features, or autonomous vehicle framework design.

Economic and Political Context

The regulatory changes come as the labour market adjusts to automation trends and unemployment rate shifts linked to technology adoption. Autonomous trucking and driverless cars could alter job availability in states like Texas DOT jurisdictions and Austin, Texas pilot zones.

Additionally, government agencies are considering how research prototypes like the Fisker Ocean, Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid, and Chevrolet Express Cutaway fit into broader national rules and regulatory frameworks. Even components like skid control ECU, laminated glass, and airbag control module standards could fall under new safety standards.

Technology Behind the Push

Many self-driving technology platforms rely on AI workflows, AI Siri, AI cloud platform integrations, and hardware in the loop testing for VIN number validation.

Advanced self-driving software in autonomous-driving systems uses neural nets and Camtronic system coordination to handle lane changes, braking, and skid control ECU activation. The same applies to Tesla’s Autopilot and Full Self Driving, which have been tested in driverless testing environments to prepare for autonomous ride-hailing service expansion.

The Bigger Picture: Self-Driving Cars, Self-Driving Vehicles, and Public Perception

Public confidence in self-driving cars depends heavily on consistent crash reporting rules, strong federal safety regulations, and visible enforcement by federal safety regulators. Without stringent crash reporting requirements, societal trust in autonomous vehicles could erode, especially after high-profile incidents involving Tesla’s Autopilot or other driver-assistance features.

Conclusion: Balancing Innovation and Public Safety

The relaxation of crash-reporting requirement obligations is a turning point in self-driving regulations. It could allow faster deployment of driverless cars and self-driving car companies’ services like robotaxi service, but also risks reducing transparency.

As the automotive industry moves forward with self-driving technology driven by artificial intelligence, international competition, and regulatory shift, the question remains: can the Department of Transportation maintain public safety without slowing down innovation?

About Ted Law Firm

Ted Law Firm, closely monitors developments in automotive policy, self-driving regulations, and federal safety standards.We serve families across Aiken, Anderson, Charleston, Columbia, Greenville, Myrtle Beach, North Augusta and Orangeburg. Our team understands the complexities of regulatory frameworks affecting self-driving cars, autonomous vehicles, and driverless cars on US roads.Contact us today for a free consultation.

Back to Blog