A late-night DUI enforcement operation in San Bruno, California, took an unexpected turn when officers stopped a Waymo driverless vehicle making an illegal U-turn. Instead of finding an impaired driver, police discovered an empty driver’s seat. The unusual stop highlighted a growing challenge for law enforcement: how to hold autonomous vehicles accountable when they violate traffic laws.
This incident underscores the legal and regulatory questions surrounding self-driving technology, as cities across California continue to adapt to the rapid rise of autonomous taxis on public roads.
The Incident in San Bruno
Police officers conducting a grant-funded DUI checkpoint were expecting to catch impaired drivers. Instead, they encountered a driverless car.
- Violation: The Waymo autonomous vehicle made an illegal U-turn at a traffic light.
- Discovery: Officers pulled the vehicle over and found no one inside.
- Response: Police contacted Waymo’s parent company, Alphabet, to report the incident.
- Outcome: No citation was issued because current California law does not recognize violations committed by autonomous vehicles without human drivers.
The San Bruno Police Department later posted about the encounter on social media, writing: “No driver, no hands, no clue.”
Current Legal Limitations
Under California law, officers cannot issue moving violations to driverless cars because there is no human driver to cite. This legal gap has created confusion for law enforcement agencies, who continue to encounter autonomous vehicles on the road.
- Citation Gap: Officers cannot write tickets to non-human entities.
- Upcoming Law: Starting July 2026, California law will allow officers to issue notices of violation directly to companies operating autonomous fleets.
- Enforcement Challenges: Until then, police have no direct way to penalize driverless cars for moving violations.
The San Bruno Police Department noted: “Our citation books don’t have a box for ‘robot.’”
The Growing Presence of Autonomous Vehicles
Waymo, a subsidiary of Alphabet, has expanded its fleet of self-driving taxis in the Bay Area and beyond. While some vehicles still have backup safety drivers, many operate fully driverless.
- San Francisco Cases: In 2024, Waymo vehicles accumulated over $65,000 in parking tickets, raising questions about accountability.
- Federal Oversight: U.S. regulators launched investigations into reports of autonomous vehicles ignoring traffic laws.
- Public Safety Concerns: Communities are increasingly concerned about how these vehicles affect roadway safety.
The San Bruno stop reflects the ongoing friction between new technology and traditional law enforcement systems.
Broader Legal and Regulatory Context
The Waymo incident is part of a broader conversation about how to regulate autonomous vehicles:
- Accountability: Should companies or manufacturers bear responsibility when self-driving cars break the law?
- Insurance and Liability: Determining who pays for accidents involving driverless cars remains a complex issue.
- Consumer Trust: High-profile incidents can undermine public confidence in autonomous technology.
- Policy Development: Legislators are working to close the enforcement gap and provide law enforcement with clear procedures.
Ethical Considerations
The incident also raises ethical questions about safety and accountability:
- Is it ethical to deploy fully autonomous cars when existing laws cannot yet regulate them effectively?
- Should companies wait until oversight frameworks are in place before expanding driverless fleets?
- How much responsibility do technology companies have to anticipate and prevent potential dangers?
For now, police departments remain focused on their core mission: keeping roads safe. But the San Bruno stop illustrates how that mission is evolving as new technology reshapes the rules of the road.
Comparison to Other Incidents
San Bruno is not the first city to face challenges with driverless vehicles:
- San Francisco: Residents and officials have reported frequent issues with autonomous taxis blocking roads, ignoring signals, and creating traffic jams.
- Parking Violations: Waymo’s cars accumulated significant fines, yet companies were able to pay them without addressing underlying problems.
- Federal Investigations: Reports of vehicles failing to obey traffic signals have drawn scrutiny from safety regulators.
These examples reveal that the San Bruno incident is part of a wider pattern.
Public Reaction
The unusual stop drew attention not only from local media but also across the country. Many social media users reacted with humor, but experts and officials recognized the seriousness of the issue.
For many, the key concern is how law enforcement can ensure accountability for autonomous systems that interact daily with human drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians.
Future of Enforcement
The upcoming California law in 2026 will allow citations to be issued directly to companies like Waymo when their vehicles commit violations. This change will give law enforcement the authority to treat corporations as the accountable party when there is no human driver.
However, this is only the beginning of a broader conversation about integrating driverless vehicles into society. Questions about liability in accidents, responsibility for injuries, and long-term oversight remain unresolved.
Final Thoughts
The San Bruno police stop of a Waymo driverless car highlights both the promise and the problems of autonomous vehicle technology. While companies continue to push forward with innovation, lawmakers and law enforcement are still catching up. Until clear systems of accountability are in place, unusual incidents like this one are likely to continue making headlines.
About Ted Law
At Ted Law Firm, is committed to representing individuals and communities affected by legal and regulatory challenges, including cases involving new and emerging technologies. We serve families across Aiken, Anderson, Charleston, Columbia, Greenville, Myrtle Beach, North Augusta and Orangeburg. By focusing on fairness and accountability, Ted Law provides strong advocacy for those navigating complex legal landscapes.Contact us today for a free consultation
